Is XDWD worth it for its lower TER?
It saves 0.08 points a year in ongoing charges. Whether that shows up in returns depends on each fund's actual tracking difference.
| Data side by side | IWDA | XDWD |
|---|---|---|
| ISIN | IE00B4L5Y983 | IE00BJ0KDQ92 |
| Issuer | iShares | Xtrackers |
| Index | MSCI World | MSCI World |
| Dividends | Accumulating (reinvests) | Accumulating (reinvests) |
| Ongoing charges (TER) | 0.20% | 0.12% |
| Replication | Physical, sampling | Physical, sampling |
| Number of holdings | 1,252 | 1,454 |
| Domicile | Ireland | Ireland |
| Launch date | 25 September 2009 | 22 July 2014 |
| Fund base currency | USD | USD |
| Listing used on this page | IWDA.AS (EUR) | XDWD.DE (EUR) |
| Market data compared | IWDA | XDWD |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | 18.4% | 18.4% |
| 2-year return | 30.5% | 30.5% |
| Annualised volatility | 14.1% | 14.3% |
| Maximum drawdown (2 years) | -21.6% | -21.6% |
Daily closes from Yahoo Finance in euros (IWDA.AS, XDWD.DE), data as of 23 October 2026. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
XDWD charges a 0.12% TER against IWDA's 0.20%. IWDA is much larger and more traded. As the portfolio is the same, their daily correlation is almost perfect and the return gap depends mainly on costs and on how efficiently each issuer tracks the index.
It saves 0.08 points a year in ongoing charges. Whether that shows up in returns depends on each fund's actual tracking difference.
They track the same index by sampling, so holdings are almost identical, though not exactly the same.
No. Both track the MSCI World, developed markets only.