Skip to main content

IWDA vs XDWD: the MSCI World from iShares and Xtrackers

IWDA and XDWD track the same index, the 23-country developed-market MSCI World, with physical sampling and an accumulating policy. The issuer, annual cost and size differ.

Data side by side

Data side by sideIWDAXDWD
ISINIE00B4L5Y983IE00BJ0KDQ92
IssueriSharesXtrackers
IndexMSCI WorldMSCI World
DividendsAccumulating (reinvests)Accumulating (reinvests)
Ongoing charges (TER)0.20%0.12%
ReplicationPhysical, samplingPhysical, sampling
Number of holdings1,2521,454
DomicileIrelandIreland
Launch date25 September 200922 July 2014
Fund base currencyUSDUSD
Listing used on this pageIWDA.AS (EUR)XDWD.DE (EUR)

Market data compared

Market data comparedIWDAXDWD
1-year return18.4%18.4%
2-year return30.5%30.5%
Annualised volatility14.1%14.3%
Maximum drawdown (2 years)-21.6%-21.6%
  • Correlation of daily returns IWDA–XDWD: 1.00

Daily closes from Yahoo Finance in euros (IWDA.AS, XDWD.DE), data as of 23 October 2026. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Two-year performance (base 100, in euros)

XDWD charges a 0.12% TER against IWDA's 0.20%. IWDA is much larger and more traded. As the portfolio is the same, their daily correlation is almost perfect and the return gap depends mainly on costs and on how efficiently each issuer tracks the index.

Frequently asked questions

Is XDWD worth it for its lower TER?

It saves 0.08 points a year in ongoing charges. Whether that shows up in returns depends on each fund's actual tracking difference.

Do they hold the same portfolio?

They track the same index by sampling, so holdings are almost identical, though not exactly the same.

Does either include emerging markets?

No. Both track the MSCI World, developed markets only.